A journal is peer-reviewed when an article may be published in it only after receiving approval by a board of experts (the author's "peers") Synonymous with "refereed " Peer-reviewed journals are considered scholarly journals Read more about the distinctions among different types of journals, Refers to periodical publications which subject submitted articles to a review by other professionals in a particular field, A journal is peer-reviewed when an article is published in it only after receiving approval by a board of experts (the author's "peers") Synonymous with "refereed ", A scholarly journal in which manuscripts submitted by potential contributors are evaluated by at least one subject specialist in addition to the editor prior to acceptance for publication, Process by which articles submitted for publication are evaluated by a group of experts in the subject area, The reviewing before publication, by an authority or authorities in the pertinent field of study, of the written form of an idea, hypothesis, theory, and/or written discussion of such, The scholarly process whereby manuscripts intended to be published in an academic journal are reviewed by independent researchers (referees) to evaluate the contribution, i.e. the importance, novelty and accuracy of the manuscript's contents, A written idea, hypothesis, or theory that has been reviewed and accepted by experts as worthy of publication in the professional literature of the experts' field, A system using reviewers who are the professional equals of the principal investigator or program director who is to be responsible for directing or conducting the proposed project It is a form of objective review Peer review is legislatively mandated in some programs and in other programs is administratively required, process in which research articles are reviewed and critiqued by experts in that field before publication, The term 'peer review' in this project involves the exercise of judgement about the quality of an ICT-based teaching and learning resource by peers who are external to the site and process of the development of that resource The review process is 'blind' - independent and anonymous, The process scientists use to examine the work of fellow scientists before it is published or accepted within the scientific community, Analysis of research by a group of professionals of comparable knowledge and expertise in a specific scientific or medical field, Written, critical response to a study, data, or report provided by scientists and other technically qualified professionals, evaluate professionally a colleague's work, A review of a software work product, following defined procedures, by peers of the producers of the product for the purpose of identifying defects and improvements, A system in which the appropriateness of healthcare services delivered by a provider to health plan members is evaluated by a panel of medical professionals, The process used by the scientific community to assess a scientific paper, report, project, or proposal by seeking comments on it from independent assessors ('peers') working in the same field, A formal review of an item by a group of peers of the item's developer, The review of casework for technical correctness by a peer, The process by which manuscripts submitted to health, biomedical, and other scientifically oriented journals and other publications are evaluated by experts in appropriate fields (usually anonymous to the authors) to determine if the manuscripts are of adequate quality for publication, A review by members of the profession "peers" regarding the quality of care provided a patient, including documentation of care (medical audit), diagnostic steps used, conclusions reached, therapy given, appropriateness of utilization (utilization review), and reasonableness of charges claims, Mechanism of ensuring quality of care within the medical community The quality assurance review is conducted by health care professionals (peers) to ensure that care provided and services used are appropriate It is also used to identify fraud and other abuses of health care payment systems, A review of a CPA firm's accounting or auditing practice involving procedures tailored to the size of the firm and the nature of its practice For PCPS and SECPS firms, includes a review of the firm's compliance with the applicable section's membership requirements Peer reviews are performed in accordance with standards established the AICPA Peer Review Board for PCPS firms and firms enrolled in the AICPA Peer Review Program, and by the SECPS Peer Review Committee for SECPS member firms, Review of health care provided by a medical staff with training equal to the staff which provided the treatment (H), The evaluation of the quality of the services provided by a plan's clinical staff by equivalently trained clinical personnel, The procedure by which academic journal articles are reviewed by other researchers before being accepted for publication, Review of applications for support from the NIH by groups composed of scientists from the extramural research community (as opposed to review by federal/NIH employees), The process of reviewing a journal article or conference paper to ensure that it meets the required standards for publication Such a review is performed by respected authorities (or peers) in the field, evaluation of the quality of total health care provided by medical staff with equivalent training, Review of health care provided by a medical staff with training equal to the staff which provided the treatment, – A review by members of the profession "peers" regarding the quality of care provided a patient, including documentation of care (medical audit), diagnostic steps used, conclusions reached, therapy given, appropriateness of utilization (utilization review), and reasonableness of charges, The evaluation of quality of total health care provided by medical staff with equivalent training, The analysis of a clinician's care by a group of that clinician's professional colleagues The provider's care is generally compared to applicable standards of care, and the group's analysis is used as a learning tool for the members of the group, Yes (Y) or No (N), articles evaluated by a panel of experts in the field and approved for publication in a scholarly journal: also known as Refereed journal or article, In peer reviewed journals, articles are evaluated by at least one subject expert before they are accepted for publication, means experts in the field evaluate the validity of an article before publication Periodical is the generic name for a "periodic" publication such as newspaper, journal, or magazine The Periodicals area is located on the fourth floor, LRC This area houses magazines, professional journals, newspapers, electronic resources for periodical indexes, Internet, and full text articles on CD-ROM or on-line, A publication, usually scholarly, in which articles are reviewed by a panel before being accepted for publication See also Scholarly Journal,
5
A journal is peer-reviewed when an article may be published in it only after receiving approval by a board of experts (the author's "peers") Synonymous with "refereed " Peer-reviewed journals are considered scholarly journals Read more about the distinctions among different types of journals
ts
6
Refers to periodical publications which subject submitted articles to a review by other professionals in a particular field
ts
7
A journal is peer-reviewed when an article is published in it only after receiving approval by a board of experts (the author's "peers") Synonymous with "refereed "
ts
8
A scholarly journal in which manuscripts submitted by potential contributors are evaluated by at least one subject specialist in addition to the editor prior to acceptance for publication
ts
9
Process by which articles submitted for publication are evaluated by a group of experts in the subject area
ts
10
peer review
The reviewing before publication, by an authority or authorities in the pertinent field of study, of the written form of an idea, hypothesis, theory, and/or written discussion of such - "Three drafts of his report were peer reviewed before it was accepted for publication."
ts
11
peer review
The scholarly process whereby manuscripts intended to be published in an academic journal are reviewed by independent researchers (referees) to evaluate the contribution, i.e. the importance, novelty and accuracy of the manuscript's contents - "Peer review happens in two ways. In one method, a paper submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal is examined by other scientists in the field before an editor (usually an expert in the field) passes judgment on it. The second method is review by an independent panel of experts who, using rigorous criteria, determine whether the findings of the paper are credible."
ts
12
peer review
A written idea, hypothesis, or theory that has been reviewed and accepted by experts as worthy of publication in the professional literature of the experts' field - "a paper submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal is examined by other scientists in the field ."
ts
13
peer review
A system using reviewers who are the professional equals of the principal investigator or program director who is to be responsible for directing or conducting the proposed project It is a form of objective review Peer review is legislatively mandated in some programs and in other programs is administratively required
ts
14
peer review
process in which research articles are reviewed and critiqued by experts in that field before publication
ts
15
peer review
The term 'peer review' in this project involves the exercise of judgement about the quality of an ICT-based teaching and learning resource by peers who are external to the site and process of the development of that resource The review process is 'blind' - independent and anonymous
ts
16
peer review
The process scientists use to examine the work of fellow scientists before it is published or accepted within the scientific community
ts
17
peer review
Analysis of research by a group of professionals of comparable knowledge and expertise in a specific scientific or medical field
ts
18
peer review
Written, critical response to a study, data, or report provided by scientists and other technically qualified professionals
ts
19
peer review
evaluate professionally a colleague's work
ts
20
peer review
A review of a software work product, following defined procedures, by peers of the producers of the product for the purpose of identifying defects and improvements
ts
21
peer review
A system in which the appropriateness of healthcare services delivered by a provider to health plan members is evaluated by a panel of medical professionals
ts
22
peer review
The process used by the scientific community to assess a scientific paper, report, project, or proposal by seeking comments on it from independent assessors ('peers') working in the same field
ts
23
peer review
A formal review of an item by a group of peers of the item's developer
ts
24
peer review
The review of casework for technical correctness by a peer
ts
25
peer review
The process by which manuscripts submitted to health, biomedical, and other scientifically oriented journals and other publications are evaluated by experts in appropriate fields (usually anonymous to the authors) to determine if the manuscripts are of adequate quality for publication
ts
26
peer review
A review by members of the profession "peers" regarding the quality of care provided a patient, including documentation of care (medical audit), diagnostic steps used, conclusions reached, therapy given, appropriateness of utilization (utilization review), and reasonableness of charges claims
ts
27
peer review
Mechanism of ensuring quality of care within the medical community The quality assurance review is conducted by health care professionals (peers) to ensure that care provided and services used are appropriate It is also used to identify fraud and other abuses of health care payment systems
ts
28
peer review
A review of a CPA firm's accounting or auditing practice involving procedures tailored to the size of the firm and the nature of its practice For PCPS and SECPS firms, includes a review of the firm's compliance with the applicable section's membership requirements Peer reviews are performed in accordance with standards established the AICPA Peer Review Board for PCPS firms and firms enrolled in the AICPA Peer Review Program, and by the SECPS Peer Review Committee for SECPS member firms
ts
29
peer review
Review of health care provided by a medical staff with training equal to the staff which provided the treatment (H)
ts
30
peer review
The evaluation of the quality of the services provided by a plan's clinical staff by equivalently trained clinical personnel
ts
31
peer review
The procedure by which academic journal articles are reviewed by other researchers before being accepted for publication
ts
32
peer review
Review of applications for support from the NIH by groups composed of scientists from the extramural research community (as opposed to review by federal/NIH employees)
ts
33
peer review
The process of reviewing a journal article or conference paper to ensure that it meets the required standards for publication Such a review is performed by respected authorities (or peers) in the field
ts
34
peer review
evaluation of the quality of total health care provided by medical staff with equivalent training
ts
35
peer review
Review of health care provided by a medical staff with training equal to the staff which provided the treatment
ts
36
peer review
– A review by members of the profession "peers" regarding the quality of care provided a patient, including documentation of care (medical audit), diagnostic steps used, conclusions reached, therapy given, appropriateness of utilization (utilization review), and reasonableness of charges
ts
37
peer review
The evaluation of quality of total health care provided by medical staff with equivalent training
ts
38
peer review
The analysis of a clinician's care by a group of that clinician's professional colleagues The provider's care is generally compared to applicable standards of care, and the group's analysis is used as a learning tool for the members of the group
ts
39
Yes (Y) or No (N)
ts
40
articles evaluated by a panel of experts in the field and approved for publication in a scholarly journal: also known as Refereed journal or article
ts
41
In peer reviewed journals, articles are evaluated by at least one subject expert before they are accepted for publication
ts
42
means experts in the field evaluate the validity of an article before publication Periodical is the generic name for a "periodic" publication such as newspaper, journal, or magazine The Periodicals area is located on the fourth floor, LRC This area houses magazines, professional journals, newspapers, electronic resources for periodical indexes, Internet, and full text articles on CD-ROM or on-line
ts
43
A publication, usually scholarly, in which articles are reviewed by a panel before being accepted for publication See also Scholarly Journal
Some etymologies, pronunciations, function and usage date content for the English translation portion are from Merriam-Webster Online at www.Merriam-Webster.com. Thanks to Online Yunanca Dil Eğitimi for providing some parts of online greek dictionary. To contribute more resources please contact us. Visuals(images) are provided by Google Image Search API. Some parts of the dictionary is contributed by many users, thank you! The content on this site is for informational purposes only. Bu aramada peer-reviewed kelimesinin sözlük anlamı ve eşanlamı nedir, nasıl okunur hakkında bilgi verilmektedir. peer-reviewed kelimesinin etimolojik ve eşanlamları ile ilgili açıklamalar ve bilgiler eksiksiz ve hatasız olarak anılmamalıdır. Burada yer alan peer-reviewed kelimesi ile ilgili tüm açıklamalar bilgi amaçlıdır. Eksik ve hatalı çevirileri lütfen bildiriniz.
